NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bahrami v R [2017] NSWCCA 8 Hearing dates: 21 November 2016 Date of orders: 13 February 2017 Decision date: 13 February 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Schmidt J at [89] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – jury irregularity – juror sends note indicating "bullying" – no investigation of substance of juror's note – juror subsequently fails to attend court –juror discharged – trial continued with reduced number of jurors – whether error in not investigating whether juror(s) guilty of bullying – whether error in asking balance of jurors to self-assess ability to properly perform duty as juror – whether error in not applying test in Webb v The Queen; Hay v The Queen (1983) 181 CLR 41 – significance of stance adopted by appellant at first instance – no error of law or miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(1) Jury Act 1977 (NSW) ss 53A, 53B, 53C, 73A Cases Cited: Black v The Queen [1993] HCA 71; 179 CLR 44 Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 R v Spilios [2016] SASCFC 6 Smith v State of Western Australia [2014] HCA 3; 250 CLR 473 Webb v The Queen; Hay v The Queen [1983] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41 Wu v The Queen [1999] HCA 52; 199 CLR 99 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Said Mir Bahrami Regina Representation: Counsel: Mr T Game SC with Mr I Nash (Appellant) Mr S Flood (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate