NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 8 Hearing dates: 23 May 2016 Date of orders: 20 February 2017 Decision date: 20 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Sheahan J Decision: See paragraph [112] Catchwords: PROSECUTION: negligence causing escape of a petroleum product – air pollution – early plea of guilty to a "derivative" offence – limited environmental and human harm – moderate objective seriousness – relative culpability of company and an individual – sentencing principles – mitigating factors – assistance to authorities – contrition and remorse – fine applied to environmental projects – costs – publication orders. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) Cases Cited: Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Environment Protection Authority v Ampol Ltd (1993) 81 LGERA 433 Environment Protection Authority v Orange City Council [1995] NSWLEC 103 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation (2006) 148 LGERA 299: [2006] NSWLEC 419 Ibbs v R (1987) 163 CLR 447; [1987] HCA 46 Jimmy v The Queen (2010) 77 NSWLR 540; [2010] NSWCCA 60 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Newcastle Port Corporation v MS Magdalene Schiffahrtsgesellschaft MBH; Newcastle Port Corporation v Vazhnenko [2013] NSWLEC 210 Plath v Rawson (2009) 170 LGERA 253; [2009] NSWLEC 178 R v Joel Clayton Tory [2006] NSWCCA 18 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Tadrosse (2005) 65 NSWLR 740; [2005] NSWCCA 145 R v Thomson, R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Veen v The Queen (1979) 143 CLR 458; [1979] HCA 7 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Howard SC, with Mr C Ireland, barrister (Prosecutor) Mr Walker SC, with Mr S Buchen, barrister (Defendant) Solicitors: Office of Environment and Heritage (Prosecutor) Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/00151308
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate