NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Udy v Tilley [2017] NSWCATAP 30 Hearing dates: 21 November 2016 Date of orders: 15 February 2017 Decision date: 15 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President, Appeals S Thode, Senior Member Decision: (1) Time for lodgment of appeal extended. (2) Orders 2 and 3 made on 14 April 2016 are set aside. (3) Application RT 16/02862, including claims for relief dismissed by Order 1 made 14 April 2016, is remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division, differently constituted, for redetermination. (4) Orders purportedly made on 25 May 2015 set aside. Catchwords: ADEQUACY OF REASONS - Orders made in respect of residential tenancy claim – Tenant applies for written reasons – Refused – Appeal lodged - Second set of reasons issued after lodgment of appeal - Second set of reasons to be disregarded –Apprehension of Bias - Failure of due process – Consideration of reasons accompanying original notice of order – Held inadequate. Orders under appeal set aside, application remitted. Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: Absolon v NSW TAFE [1999] NSWCA 311 Assadourian v Roads and Maritime Services (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 46 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20 JCD Ideas Holdings Pty Ltd T/AS Cafeideas v Poole & Poole [2015] NSWCATAP 122 Keith v Gal [2013] NSWCA 339 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Udy (Appellant) Monique Tilley (Respondent) Representation: In person (Appellant) Ms Howarth, agent, by leave (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/24187 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 14 April 2016 Before: W Sponza, General Member File Number(s): RT 16/02862
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate