NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CSZ v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 57 Hearing dates: 19 January 2017 Date of orders: 19 January 2017 Decision date: 19 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Anderson, Senior Member Emeritus Professor P Foreman, General Member Decision: The Tribunal declares that the applicant is not to be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 in respect of the offence of carnal knowledge of which he was convicted in 1976. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- Working with Children check clearance sought by way of an enabling order under section 28 of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW)- disqualifying offences under section 71 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) of carnal knowledge in 1976 - assessment of risk posed by applicant- whether the applicant has proven he is not a risk to the safety of children -Tribunal not bound by the rules of evidence - onus of proof discharged by applicant- enabling order granted and the applicant is not to be treated as a disqualified person. Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: CHB v The Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 2014 CMA v The Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 264 CMT v The Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 280 ZZ v The Secretary Department of Justice [2013] VSC 267 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CSZ (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378389 Publication restriction: Disclosure of the name of the applicant and the name of any alleged victim or child referred to in the material before the Tribunal is prohibited. Note: the name of a person includes a reference to any information, picture or other material that identifies the person or is likely to lead to the identification of the person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate