NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Osborne v R; R v Osborne [2017] NSWCCA 11 Hearing dates: 16 September 2016 Decision date: 17 February 2017 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Harrison J at [155]; Wilson J at [156] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal against conviction. 2. Allow appeal against conviction. 3. Quash convictions on each count. 4. Enter a verdict of acquittal on each count. 5. Dismiss Crown appeal against sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – defrauding the Commonwealth – accountant charged with causing client's tax return to be lodged without disclosing all of client's income – client controlled offshore company which owned large parcel of shares – client caused offshore company to sell shares and directed proceeds to be received by client and his family and companies associated with them – after conclusion of evidence, trial judge permitted Crown to advance a case that offshore company held shares as bare trustee for client – Crown addressed jury that it was sufficient in order to conclude that client was beneficiary of bare trust to find that client controlled offshore company – trial judge left jury to determine correct legal test for existence of trust – evidence did not entitle jury to conclude that client was beneficiary of bare trust – convictions quashed and verdicts of acquittal entered Legislation Cited: Commonwealth Criminal Code, ss 5.1, 130.3, 135.1 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 29D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 97 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Bamford (2010) 240 CLR 481; [2010] HCA 10 Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 343; [2001] HCA 46 King v The Queen (1989) 161 CLR 423 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Nasrallah v R; R v Nasrallah [2015] NSWCCA 188 Phillips v R [2016] NSWCCA 159 Pratten v R [2014] NSWCCA 117 R v Cox [1999] NSWCCA 62 R v Esho; R v Sako [2001] NSWCCA 415 R v Jimenez [2000] NSWCCA 390 Rasic v R; Johnny Lee Vella v R; Damien Charles Vella v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Re Ellenborough [1903] 1 Ch 697 Silva v R [2016] NSWCCA 284 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Clifford Osborne (Appellant / Respondent) Regina (Respondent / Appellant) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC, L Hutchinson (Mr Osborne) M McHugh SC, S Flood (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate