NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ellis's Town House Pty Ltd v Botan Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 20 Hearing dates: 7 February 2017 Decision date: 17 February 2017 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Leeming JA at [47] Simpson JA at [61] Decision: (1) Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from judgment of the District Court – where damages awarded for breach of lessor's painting and repairing covenants under a lease – matter less than $100,000 – where no issue of principle, question of general importance or injustice which is reasonably clear – leave to appeal refused.
LANDLORD AND TENANT – covenants – as to painting and repair – breach of landlord's covenant to maintain motel premises in good condition and serviceable repair – breach of landlord's covenant to paint and varnish parts of premises – tenant has not yet incurred expense in remedying landlord's defaults – whether cost of remedying landlord's default is the appropriate measure of damages.
DAMAGES – general principles – breach of landlord's painting and repairing covenants – where tenant has not yet incurred expense in remedying lessor's defaults – where landlord asserted no actual loss suffered by tenant – whether damages properly awarded on 'costs of cure' basis rather than 'difference in value' basis. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 58, 60 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127(2)(c) Sale of Goods Act (1923) (NSW), s 54(3) Cases Cited: Alley v Deschamps (1806) 13 Ves Jun 255; 33 ER 278 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613; [1954] HCA 36 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (2008) 166 FCR 494; [2008] FCAFC 38 Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 361 Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher [1984] 1 WLR 287 Clark v Macourt (2013) 253 CLR 1; [2013] HCA 56 Coffs Harbour City Council v McLeod [2016] NSWCA 94 Coulls v Bagot's Executor & Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 119 CLR 460; [1967] HCA 3 DH MB Pty Ltd v Manning Motel Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 396 Granada Theatres Ltd v Freehold Investment (Leytonstone) Ltd [1959] Ch 592 Hewitt v Rowlands [1924] All ER Rep 344 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Joyner v Weeks [1891] QB 31 Polo Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd v Pinctada Hotels and Resorts Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 397 Progressive Mailing House v Tabali (1985) 157 CLR 17; [1985] HCA 14 Radford v De Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262; 1 All ER 33 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850; 154 ER 363 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272; [2009] HCA 8 The Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64; [1991] HCA 54 Wenham v Ella (1972) 127 CLR 454 Wheeler v Ecroplot [2010] NSWCA 61 Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales [2004] HCATrans 200 (15 June 2004) Zhu v Treasurer of New South Wales (2004) 218 CLR 530; [2004] HCA 56 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ellis's Town House Pty Ltd (ACN 135 401 973) (Appellant) Botan Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Downing / Mr J Raftery (Appellant) Mr P Bolster (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate