NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wade v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAP 33 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 Date of orders: 17 February 2017 Decision date: 17 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President, Appeals S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL REGULATION – Tattoo Parlours Industry – Refusal of operator licence – cancellation of tattooist licence – following adverse security determination by Commissioner of Police – Affirmed by Tribunal – Appeal – Whether Tribunal had regard to relevant considerations – Appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Cases Cited: Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Commissioner of Police v Sleiman & AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] NSWCA 21 GWVR and Director-General of Security [2010] AATA 1062 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Wainohu v New South Wales [2011] HCA 24 Smith v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation (No 3) [2011] NSWCA 200 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Malcolm Victor Charles Wade (Appellant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: M Wade (Appellant in person) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondents) File Number(s): AP 16/21487 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the Respondents on a confidential basis. That material is not to be released either to the Appellant or to the public. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: Wade v Commissioner of Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 149 Date of Decision: 18 July 2016 Before: A Scahill, Senior Member File Number(s): 1610139
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate