NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Qaumi (No 11) [2017] NSWSC 95 Hearing dates: 2 December 2016, 13 – 14 February 2017 Date of orders: 14 February 2017 Decision date: 14 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Evidence admissible for a limited purpose Catchwords: EVIDENCE – admissibility – actions of one accused admitted against both accused – no objection taken – objection taken during closing address – flexibility in procedure during Judge alone trial – evidence of one accused moving murder weapon some weeks after the murder – whether act done in furtherance of common purpose – co-conspirators' rule – circumstantial case – evidence linking accused to murder weapon – evidence admissible for a limited purpose – evidence not admissible to prove consciousness of guilt against accused not present Cases Cited: R v Eccles and Merritt (1881) 7 VLR (L) 36 R v SU and Ors (1995) 129 FLR 120 Tripodi v The Queen (1961) 104 CLR 1; [1961] HCA 22 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Representation: Counsel: K McKay (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (Accused – F Qaumi) P Young SC (Accused – M Qaumi)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) Archbold Legal (Accused – F Qaumi) George Sten & Co (Accused – M Qaumi) File Number(s): Farhad Qaumi – 2014/006809, 2014/315203; Mumtaz Qaumi – 2014/315260
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate