New South Wales Crime Commission v Jamie Dunn [2017] NSWSC 97

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: New South Wales Crime Commission v Jamie Dunn [2017] NSWSC 97 Hearing dates: 16 February 2017 Date of orders: 16 February 2017 Decision date: 16 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Upon the Plaintiff giving the usual undertaking as to damages (the giving of which by its solicitor being noted) and

Considering that, having had regard to the matters contained in the affidavit of Katie Elaine Bourne sworn 16 February 2017, there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion stated therein.

The Court orders:

1. Pursuant to section 10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 no person (other than any registered mortgagee dealing with its right to do so under the registered mortgage) is to dispose of, or attempt to dispose of, or otherwise deal with or attempt to otherwise deal with any interest in property (within the meaning of "interest in property" as defined in section 7 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990) of Jamie Bryan Dunn, including the interest in property in the property specified in Schedules One and Two hereto.

2. Pursuant to section 10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 no person (other than any registered mortgagee dealing with its right to do so under the registered mortgage) is to dispose of, or attempt to dispose of, or otherwise deal with or attempt to otherwise deal with any interest in property (within the meaning of "interest in property" as defined in section 7 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990) of Bruce Alexander Dunn, including the interest in property in the property specified in Schedules One and Three hereto.