NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Richardson v The Medical Council of NSW [2017] NSWSC 105 Hearing dates: 9 February 2017 Decision date: 09 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: White J Decision: 1. Order that the notice of motion filed 3 February 2017 be dismissed with costs. 2. Order that the summons be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for stay of inquiry by Professional Standards Committee – whether reasonable apprehension of bias – whether member ought to have recused himself in circumstances where member and expert did not have a professional relationship and degree of association was insubstantial – not open to infer that member would bring an open mind only in relation to preference of evidence between expert witnesses - no reasonable layperson would reasonably apprehend that member might not bring an impartial mind Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Ebner v Official Trustee (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Emanuele v Emanuel Investment Pty Ltd (1997) 139 FLR 36 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; (2003) 195 ALR 225 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342; [1986] HCA 39 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Richardson (Plaintiff) The Medical Council of NSW (1st Defendant) Health Care Complaints Commission (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G M Gregg (Plaintiff) P Lowson (1st Defendant) J Dinihan, Solicitor (2nd Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate