NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Bova [2017] NSWCATOD 28 Hearing dates: Stage 113 November 2015, 1, 2 & 3 December 2015, 9 & 10 February 2016 Stage 217 October 2016 Date of orders: 17 October 2016 Decision date: 21 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: O Shub, Principal Member J Zwart, Professional Member M Duguid, Professional Member P Hooker, General Member Decision: The Practitioner having been found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct, conditions were placed on the Respondent's Registration as per the orders made at paragraph 21. Catchwords: Pharmacy, compounding, substitution, commercially available. Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW). Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] Gianoutsos v Glykis (2006) In re Dr. Suman Sood [2006] Health Care Complaints Commission of New South Wales v Jonathan Fryar [2013] Kirby P., in Pillai v Messiter [No. 2] (1989) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) (Applicant)
Nicholas Patrick Bova (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Bennett (Applicant) R Lancaster SC with A Gerard (Respondent)
Solicitors: J Dinihan (Applicant) D King (Respondent) File Number(s): 1520093
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate