NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MG v R [2017] NSWCCA 14 Hearing dates: 13 February 2017 Date of orders: 13 February 2017 Decision date: 24 February 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [106] Latham J at [107] Decision: Leave to appeal against conviction granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – 14 counts of sexual assault – applicant convicted of 7 counts and acquitted of 7 counts – whether verdicts of guilty supported by evidence – whether inconsistent verdicts – ample evidence to support convictions – rational and logical explanation for not guilty verdicts – appeal against conviction dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61M(2), 66C(1), 66C(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ss 5(1)(b), 6(1) Cases Cited: MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; 52 NSWLR 82 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151; 74 NSWLR 299 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Wingrove-Pryce v R [2014] NSWCCA 290 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MG - Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: A Mitchelmore /L Coleman - Applicant N Williams – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2012/187101 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 15 May 2015 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2012/187101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate