NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Spata v Tumino; Estate of Gina Spata [2017] NSWSC 111 Hearing dates: 29, 30 March, 1 April, 13 May 2016 Date of orders: 24 February 2017 Decision date: 24 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Brereton J Decision: The plaintiff is not an eligible person. Proceedings dismissed. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family Provision – claim by adult stepson – whether plaintiff eligible in category (e) – whether members of same household as deceased –whether dependent on deceased - whether circumstances warranting – whether left with inadequate provision – where deceased had received provision from plaintiff's father's estate to detriment of plaintiff Legislation Cited: (NSW) Succession Act 2006, s 57(1)(e), s 59(1)(b) Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson [2010] NSWCA 176 Amaca Pty Ltd v Novek [2009] NSWCA 50 Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656 Ashdown v Public Trustee (unreported, SC(WA), Ipp J, No 1269/1986, 27 September 1989, BC8900913) Ball v Newey (1988) 13 NSWLR 489 Benney v Jones (1991) 23 NSWLR 559 Benney v Jones (unreported, SC(NSW), Young J, No 1951/1989, 13 February 1990, BC9002739) Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Burke v Burke [2015] NSWCA 195 Churton v Christian (1988) 13 NSWLR 241 Clinch v Swift (unreported, SC(NSW), Young J, No 3008/1985, 13 October 1986, BC8600634) Corcoran v Bizannes (unreported, SC(NSW), Needham J, No 2076/1984, 4 June 1985, BC8500783) Dijkhuijs v Barclay (1988) 13 NSWLR 639 Fulop (dec'd), Re; Fulop v Public Trustee (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Hakim, Re Estate of; Simons v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [2005] NSWSC 223 Henry v Hancock [2016] NSWSC 71 Kauri Timber Co (Tas) Pty Ltd v Reeman (1973) 128 CLR 177; [1972-73] ALR 1266; (1973) 47 ALJR 184 Lodin v Lodin; Estate of Dr Mohammad Masoud Lodin [2017] NSWSC 10 Marning v Staniforth (unreported, SC(NSW), Hodgson J, No 3151/1985, 25 March 1987, BC8701486) Marras, In the Estate of the late Anthony [2014] NSWSC 915 McKenzie v Baddeley (unreported, NSWCA, Priestley, Meagher JJA and Hope AJA, No 40299/1991, 3 December 1991, BC9101389) McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 Middleton v Kiama District Hospital [1970] 3 NSWR 136 Moloney v Goodwin (unreported, SC(NSW), Needham J, No 5179/1988, 1 August 1989, BC8901894) O'Shaughnessy v Mantle (1986) 7 NSWLR 142 Petrohilos v Hunter (1991) 25 NSWLR 343 Puie v Public Trustee of Queensland (1986) Q ConvR ¶54-215 Shaw v Lambert (unreported, SC(NSW), Young J, No 4126/1986, 9 October 1987, BC8701079) Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan [2013] NSWSC 522 Spata v Spata [2011] NSWSC 1221 Stewart v McDougall (unreported, SC(NSW), Young J, No 2985/1986, 19 November 1987, BC8702350) Stone v Stone [2016] NSWSC 605 Vigolo v Bostin [2005] HCA 11; (2005) 221 CLR 191 Wright v Hamill (unreported, SC(NSW), Needham J, No 1404/1989, 18 July 1989, BC8901948) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Giovanni Spata (plaintiff) Franco Tumino (first defendant) Enza Liberatore (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: J. Brown (plaintiff) J. Armfield (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate