NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bugmy v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 25 Hearing dates: 15 February 2017 Date of orders: 15 February 2017 Decision date: 24 February 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [9]; Payne JA at [10]. Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL – high risk violent offender –continuing detention order under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – whether primary judge erred in determining the length of the continuing detention order – whether primary judge failed to give adequate reasons Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 5E, 5F, 5G, 11, 17, 18, 19 Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW), Pt 3 Cases Cited: Anderson v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 86 Attorney-General (Qld) v Francis [2006] QCA 324 Attorney-General v Wilde [2008] NSWSC 14 Keith v Gal [2013] NSWCA 339 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 Resource Pacific Pty Ltd v Wilkinson [2013] NSWCA 33 State of New South Wales v Bugmy (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1432 State of New South Wales v Davis [2008] NSWSC 664 State of New South Wales v Donovan (2015) 90 NSWLR 389; [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1367 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Damien Charles Bugmy (appellant) State of New South Wales (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Buchanan SC / Ms G Lewer (appellant) Mr G P Craddock SC / Mr P Aitken (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate