NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Antova v Bokan [2017] NSWSC 115 Hearing dates: 15, 16, 17 February 2017 Decision date: 17 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Kunc J Decision: Agreement to settle proceedings binding; enforcement stayed Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Whether parties intended settlement agreement to be immediately binding – Whether enforcement should be stayed Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 30 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 95, 98 Cases Cited: Bartlett v Coomber [2008] NSWCA 100 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v GR Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Donnellan v Watson (1990) 21 NSWLR 335 Jingalong Pty Limited v Todd [2015] NSWCA 7 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 72 Morrison v Abbott [2012] NSWSC 320 Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Limited (2015) 90 NSWLR 605; [2015] NSWCA 313 Perri v Coolangatta Investments Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 537; [1982] HCA 29 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596; [1979] HCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Radmila Antova (Plaintiff) Vase Antov (Second Plaintiff) Lidija Bokan (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Sahade (Plaintiffs) M J Heath (Defendant)
Solicitors: Oliveri Lawyers (Second Plaintiff) Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/331929 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate