NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Owens v R [2017] NSWCCA 16 Hearing dates: 31 January 2017 Date of orders: 24 February 2017 Decision date: 24 February 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Johnson J at [2] Fagan J at [89] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - robbery in company contrary to s.97(1) Crimes Act 1900 - suggested error in use of R v Henry guideline - suggested error in double counting fact that offence committed in company - claim that sentence manifestly excessive - no error demonstrated - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Legge v R [2007] NSWCCA 244 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 19 Markarian v The Queen [2005] 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Porter v R [2008] NSWCCA 145 R v AB (2011) 59 MVR 356; [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Lesi [2005] NSWCCA 63 R v Murchie (1999) 108 A Crim 482; [1999] NSWCCA 424 R v Speechley (2012) 221 A Crim R 175; [2012] NSWCCA 130 R v Stanley [2003] NSWCCA 233 R v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 109 Rudolf v R [2016] NSWCCA 313 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shayden Owens (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Adamo with Mr G Beveridge (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate