NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Robert Holloway v R [2017] NSWCCA 17 Hearing dates: 15 February 2017 Date of orders: 24 February 2017 Decision date: 24 February 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Latham J at [3]. Decision: (1) Appeal against conviction dismissed. (2) Leave to appeal against the sentence is granted. (3) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – conviction – whether inconsistency of verdicts – 79 counts of fraud – whether sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Mackenzie v The Queen [1996] HC 35 ; 190 CLR 348 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584, [2001] HCA 64 Stratford v R [2007] NSWCCA 279 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Michael Robert Holloway (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Coyne (Appellant) S Hughes (Respondent)
Solicitors: C Sweeney (Appellant) C Hyland (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/63599 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 12 February 2016 Before: Baly DCJ File Number(s): 2013/63599
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate