NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre (No. 6) [2017] NSWDC 25 Hearing dates: 22 February 2017 Date of orders: 22 February 2017 Decision date: 22 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Plaintiff called three (3) times outside Court 13D at 9:05am – No appearance. (2) Plaintiff called three (3) times outside Court 13D at 9:25am – No appearance. (3) Plaintiff called three (3) times a third time outside Court 13D at 9:50am – No appearance. (4) Proceedings are dismissed. (5) Plaintiff pay defendant's costs of the application and of the proceedings. (6) A copy of this judgment is to be forwarded to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – plaintiff fails to comply with peremptory order to file amended statement of claim – long history of delay in pleadings – application by defendant pursuant to ss 61(3)(a) and 61(3)(b) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) and rr 12.7(1) and 12.9(2)(c) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) to strike out proceedings – complaints concerning plaintiff's conduct of proceedings, including making private recordings of court proceedings – proceedings dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 and 61 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 12.7 and 12.9 Cases Cited: Douglas v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 126 Jane Doe 1 v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 57 Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre [2015] NSWDC 145 Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre (No. 2) [2015] NSWDC 214 Michail v Mount Druitt and Area Community Legal Centre Inc [2015] NSWCA 396 Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre (No. 3) (District Court of New South Wales, Gibson DCJ, 9 February 2016) Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre (No. 4) (District Court of New South Wales, Gibson DCJ, 1 June 2016) Michail v Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre (No.5) [2017] NSWDC 13 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Nancy Michail Defendant: Mount Druitt & Area Community Legal Centre Representation: Counsel: Defendant: Ms S Chrysanthou
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate