NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wayland v Bird [2017] NSWCA 26 Hearing dates: 10 February 2017 Decision date: 28 February 2017 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [44] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal refused with costs. Catchwords: INSURANCE – claims generally – application for leave to appeal from refusal of application by plaintiffs for leave pursuant to s 6(4) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) to join defendant's professional indemnity insurer – principles governing discretion to grant leave – application for leave to appeal heard concurrently with appeal in event leave were to be granted – complaint that insufficient material for primary judge's finding that insured's conduct caused such prejudice that insurer entitled to disclaim liability – complaint that primary judge erred in not finding that there was a real possibility that insured would not be able to meet an adverse judgment – where amount in dispute relatively small and other avenues open to plaintiffs – application for leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 54 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 6 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 347 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), Sch 2 cl 4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.10 Cases Cited: Bailey v NSW Medical Defence Union Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 399; [1995] HCA 28 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Clarke v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 27 Dunn v Ross Lamb Motors [1978] 1 NSWLR 26 Energize Fitness Pty Ltd v Vero Insurance Ltd [2012] NSWCA 213 Gorczynski v W&FT Osmo Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 163 Guild Insurance Ltd v Hepburn [2014] NSWCA 400 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Oswald v Bailey (1987) 11 NSWLR 715 Polo Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd v Pinctada Hotels and Resorts Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 397 The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Tzaidas v Child (2004) 61 NSWLR 18 Zelden v Sewell Henamast Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 56 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael John Wayland and Amanda Kim Wayland (Applicants) Daniel Bird (First Respondent) (no appearance) Pacific International Insurance Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Miller QC with Ms N Compton (Applicants) J Guihot (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate