NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Qaumi (No 12) [2017] NSWSC 134 Hearing dates: 31 October 2016 – 8 December 2016, 1 – 14 February 2017 Date of orders: 28 February 2017 Decision date: 28 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Verdicts: Count 1: Farhad Qaumi – guilty of murder. Mumtaz Qaumi – guilty of murder. Count 2: Farhad Qaumi – guilty of possession of pistol. Convicted on each count. Adjourned for sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – trial by judge alone – murder – contract killing – Brothers for Life – informant witnesses – circumstantial case – where deceased had many enemies – relevance of evidence of motive in others – overpriced kebab shop – "business" – whether sham transaction – where dangerous to convict on evidence of individual informers – requirement that evidence be supported by other evidence – surveillance and telephone intercepts – connections and meetings between accused and participants – accused met with driver and shooter two hours before killing – evidence of reconnoitre of victim's house five days before shooting – whether evidence of informants supported by surveillance evidence – where gaps in surveillance – whether supported by telephone intercepts – inferences available from evidence – timing of meetings
CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – snub nose 38 – movement of murder weapon after murder – whether admissible against both accused – joint criminal enterprise – co-conspirators rule – whether act done in furtherance of criminal enterprise – evidence admissible to establish connexion with murder weapon – evidence not admissible to prove consciousness of guilt
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate