NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Siemek v R [2017] NSWCCA 18 Hearing dates: 2 February 2017 Date of orders: 01 March 2017 Decision date: 01 March 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Button J at [84] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - domestic violence offences - offence of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm against Applicant's former wife - Applicant subject to conditional liberty at time for separate assault against a different former partner - Applicant with mental health issues - history of domestic violence against former wife and former partner - claim of error in approach to breach of conditional liberty - claim of error in approach to accumulation of sentences - claim that total effective sentence manifestly excessive - no error demonstrated - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Browning v R [2015] NSWCCA 147 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Cooke (2007) 168 A Crim R 379; [2007] NSWCA 2 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Porter v R [2008] NSWCCA 145 R v Dinh (2010) 199 A Crim R 573 [2010] NSWCCA 74
R v Gommeson (2014) 243 A Crim R 534; [2014] NSWCCA 159 R v Hamid (2006) 164 A Crim R 179; [2006] NSWCCA 302 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin Karl Siemek (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr CP O'Donnell SC Ms N Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate