NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Norman McDonald & Anor v Central Coast Council [2017] NSWLEC 1090 Hearing dates: 21-24 February 2017 Decision date: 28 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: Refer to directions at paragraph 74. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: alterations and additions to the Avoca Beach Theatre; mixed use development; impact on the heritage qualities and character of the Avoca Beach Theatre; parking. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Heritage Act 1977 Cases Cited: BGP Properties v Lake Macquarie (2004) 138 LGERA 237 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Norman Augustus McDonald Hunter and Beth Janine Hunter (Applicant) Central Coast Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC with Ms A. Hemmings barrister (Applicant) Mr M. Staunton barrister (Respondent) Solicitors: Conditsis Lawyers (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/155633
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 42661/2012 for proposed alterations and additions to the existing Avoca Beach Theatre for a mixed use development (the proposal) at 69-71 Avoca Drive, Avoca Beach (the site) by Central Coast Council (the Council). 2. The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 18 July 2016, in accordance with the provisions of s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached during the conciliation phase, the conciliation conference was terminated on 22 July 2016, pursuant to s 34(4) of the LEC Act. 3. Leave was granted by the Court on 16 September 2016 for the applicant to rely on an amended proposal. Leave was granted by the Court at the commencement of the hearing in court for the applicant to rely on a further amended proposal incorporating two minor amendments (the proposal).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate