NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kalice v Borck & Ors [2017] NSWCATAP 46 Hearing dates: 15 February 2017 Date of orders: 28 February 2017 Decision date: 28 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member G Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Residential tenancies---Failure of a party to appear-Procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 ss 36, 38, 80, Sch 4 Cl 12 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 R 9, R 25 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 ss 37, 51, 162, 175 Cases Cited: Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Yuen v Thom [2016] NSWCATAP 243 Toberty v Lacey [2017] NSWCATAP 28 Waters v Waghorn [2016] NSWCATAP 247 Hood t/as UR Place Landscape v Rutten [2016] NSWCATAP 250 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ray Kalice (Appellant) Michael, Isabel, Chelsea & Harley Borck (Respondents) Representation: In Person (Appellant) No appearance (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/46393 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 30 September 2016 Before: S Hennings File Number(s): RT 16/41543
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate