NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JH v R [2017] NSWCCA 22 Hearing dates: 17 October 2016 Date of orders: 03 March 2017 Decision date: 03 March 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Davies J at [1] Bellew J at [1] Decision: (1) On the conviction appeal: (a) Leave to appeal granted. (b) Appeal dismissed.
(2) On the sentence appeal: (a) Leave to appeal granted. (b) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – manslaughter – unlawful and dangerous act – appeal against conviction – applicant in a group who bashed and kicked victim – whether verdict was unreasonable – reliability of identification evidence – whether sufficient evidence of motive – whether miscarriage of justice by incompetence of trial counsel – whether other evidence should have been led to detract from Crown case on motive – whether evidence should have been led of a second attack not involving applicant – whether applicant properly advised of his right to give evidence – whether miscarriage of justice by prosecutor's remarks to jury
EVIDENCE – application to lead new evidence on appeal – whether new evidence was fresh evidence – whether evidence of sufficient cogency that innocence is shown or to give rise to a reasonable doubt – whether miscarriage of justice where evidence not led Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alseedi v R [2009] NSWCCA 185 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Field v R [2015] NSWCCA 332 Kees Langelaar v R [2016] NSWCCA 143 Lane v R [2013] NSWCCA 317; 241 A Crim R 321 MG v R; AE v R [2016] NSWCCA 228 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 80 ALJR 614 R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; (2004) 149 A Crim R 417 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Gordon (1994) 71 A Crim R 459 R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 R v LLM [2005] NSWCCA 302 The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35; (2016) 90 ALJR 1013 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21; (2012) 84 NSWLR 581 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JH (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Coady (Applicant) M Cinque SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate