NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Le v Brown; Nguyen v Brown; Tran v Brown; Monica v Brown; Huggett v Brown [2017] NSWSC 162 Hearing dates: 20 February 2017 Decision date: 22 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Application for leave to serve an additional expert report refused Catchwords: PROCEDURE – expert evidence – case management – application by defendant for leave to serve expert report outside timeframe ordered by the Court – where the same defendant had already served reports of three experts in the same field of expertise – closeness to hearing – prospect of prejudice to other defendant Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), pt 6 Practice Note SC CL 5, cls 33, 34 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), pt 31.28 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2014/271370 Thi Le Le (plaintiff) Edwin Christopher Brown (first defendant) Shark Group Pty Ltd (second defendant) Futurewood Pty Limited (third defendant)
2014/347492 Cindy Xuan Vy Nguyen (plaintiff) Edwin Christopher Brown (first defendant) Shark Group Pty Ltd (second defendant) Futurewood Pty Limited (third defendant)
2014/358521 Van Diep Tran (plaintiff) Edwin Christopher Brown (first defendant) Shark Group Pty Ltd (second defendant) Futurewood Pty Limited (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate