NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Spotlight Pty Ltd v Maintek Roofing Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] NSWSC 165 Hearing dates: 5 December 2016 Decision date: 03 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the second cross-defendant to have separate legal representation from the solicitors and counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff in the principal proceedings in order to defend the second cross-claim. (2) Unless an application for a different order is made in writing to my Associate within seven days, costs of the motion are reserved. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for separate representation – where plaintiff as plaintiff has different interests from plaintiff as cross-defendant – difference between insurers as to pleading of set-off – order for separate representation to be made in rare circumstances – whether actual conflict required in order for grant of leave to have separate representation. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 90 Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW), rr 4, 11 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 23 Cases Cited: AMP Capital Investors Pty Limited v Parson Brinkerhoff Australia Pty Limited; Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Limited v AMP Capital Investors Limited [2013] NSWSC 1633 Buses and 4WD Hire Pty Limited v Oz Snow Adventures Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1017 Carter & Ors v Marine Helicopters Ltd & Ors (1996) 9 ANZ Ins Cas 61-299 Dealer Support Services Pty Ltd v Motor Trades Association of Australia Ltd [2014] FCA 1065 Elphick v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Company Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 356 GPI Leisure v Herdsman Investments (No. 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 Herbert v Badgery (1893) 14 LR (NSW) Eq 321 Konneh v New South Wales (No 2) (2013) NSWSC 390 Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd (No 2) [1964] 2 QB 601 Tindle v Ansett Transport Industries (1990) 21 NSWLR 492 UT (Aust) Pty Ltd v The Partners of Piper Alderman [2008] NSWSC 219 Texts Cited: P Taylor, Dr E Elms, M Meek SC, The Hon Justice G Bellew , Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW (LexisNexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Spotlight Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Applicant/Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim) Maintek Roofing Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Maintek NSW Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Fatseas Investments Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Robert & Marks Architects Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) AAI Limited t/as GIO (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J A Gracie (Plaintiff) Mr D S Weinberger (Applicant) Mr Carey (Third Defendant) Ms Y Bell (Fifth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate