NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Piper v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 15 Hearing dates: 23 February 2017 Date of orders: 06 March 2017 Decision date: 06 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Sheahan J Decision: The Applicant's Notice of Motion to amend is dismissed. See paragraph [84] Catchwords: APPEAL: application to amend a Class 1 application – principles to be applied – separated question outstanding in respect of the competency of appeal – construction of relevant provisions affecting replacement of former legislation – costs. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Water Act 1912 Water Management Act 2000 Water Management Amendment Act 2014 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Barrington-Gloucester-Stroud Preservation Alliance Inc v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2012] NSWLEC 197 Charles and Howard Pty Ltd v Redland Shire Council [2007] QCA 200 Greek Australian Finance Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1974) 29 LGRA 130 Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 Piper v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 [2016] NSWLEC 136 Rural Funds Management Limited v The Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 [2016] NSWLEC 19 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Corie Bruce Piper (First Applicant) Nicole Louise Piper (Second Applicant) Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Docker, barrister (Applicants) Ms R Mansted, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate