NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arnold v Matsias [2017] NSWSC 173 Hearing dates: 24 February 2017 Date of orders: 06 March 2017 Decision date: 06 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The defendant's notice of motion filed 1 August 2016 is dismissed.
(2) Costs of the hearings before Hall J on 31 October 2016 and Harrison AsJ on 17 February 2017 are costs in the cause. Catchwords: INTERROGATORIES – negligence – breach – duty of care – notice of motion Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 49.19 Cases Cited: Bendixen v Coleman [1943] HCA 40; (1943) 68 CLR 401 Texts Cited: Bailliere's Australian Nurses' Dictionary (1991 ed) Concise Oxford Dictionary (10th ed) Oxford University Press Macquarie Dictionary (6th ed) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Simon Arnold (Plaintiff) Chris Matsias (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P D'Arcy-King (Plaintiff) J Lonergan SC (Defendant)
Solicitors: Slater & Gordon Lawyers (Plaintiff) Meridian Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/244084 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. HER HONOUR: By notice of motion filed 1 August 2016, the defendant seeks an order pursuant to Rule 49.19 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) that the judgment of Registrar Bradford dated 5 July 2016 be set aside.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate