NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attia v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWSC 178 Hearing dates: 20, 22, 24 February 2017 Decision date: 03 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application for a stay and alternatively an interlocutory order reinstating the plaintiff's registration as a pharmacist refused; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal that the plaintiff's registration as a pharmacist be cancelled – where cancellation order implemented by a separate statutory agency prior to commencement of appeal – application for interlocutory restorative injunction – whether Court has power to order the agency to reinstate the plaintiff's name to the register pending determination of the appeal – factors relevant to the exercise of any such discretion Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) s 60(2) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 61, s 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2013 (NSW), reg 9 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police (2010) 78 NSWLR 302; [2010] NSWCA 81 Deano v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWSC 1570 Health Care Complaints Commission v Attia [2016] NSWCATAD 309 Health Care Complaints Commission v Attia (No 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 25 Lucire v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 99 McBride v Walton (Court of Appeal (NSW), Handley JA, 27 August 1993, unrep) McClymont v The Owners-Strata Plan No 12139 [2009] NSWSC 276 Russo v Legal Services Commissioner [2016] NSWCA 95 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mina Attia (plaintiff) Health Care Complaints Commission (defendant) Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (proposed second defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Flaherty (plaintiff) L Fernandez (defendant) K J Young (proposed second defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate