O’Connell v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 32
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O'Connell v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 32
Hearing dates: 27 February 2017
Decision date: 07 March 2017
Jurisdiction: Occupational Division
Before: K Ransome, Senior Member
Decision: The decision is affirmed.
Catchwords: HOME BUILDING – contractor licence electrical wiring work – instrument made under repealed 2004 regulation – whether applicant meets qualification requirements
Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989
Home Building Amendment Act 2014
Home Building Regulation 2004
Home Building Regulation 2014
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Andrew O'Connell (Applicant)
Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
In Person (Applicant)
Fair Trading Legal Services, Office of Finance, Services & Innovation (Respondent)
File Number(s): 16/378790
REASONS FOR DECISION
1. This is an application by Mr Andrew O'Connell for review of a decision of the Commissioner for Fair Trading to refuse him an individual contractor licence in the category of electrical wiring work. The licence was refused on the basis that Mr O'Connell does not possess the required qualifications for the licence.
The legislative scheme
1. The Home Building Act 1989 (the Home Building Act) is part of the legislative scheme which regulates many aspects of the home building industry in New South Wales. The scheme is concerned to provide consumer protection including regulating the issue, suspension and cancellation of various licences in relation to residential building work.
2. On 20 December 2013 the Commissioner for Fair Trading in accordance with cl 28(1) of the Home Building Regulation 2004 (the 2004 Regulation) determined the qualifications, examination and experience requirements for electrical wiring work licences. The instrument setting out the required qualifications was published in the NSW Government Gazette on 10 January 2014.
3. At the time, the power of the Commissioner to determine the standards that had to be met before a contractor licence was issued was contained in s 20(2) of the Home Building Act. Since the determination was made, the Home Building Act has been amended by the Home Building Amendment Act 2014 which commenced on 15 January 2015. In addition, the 2004 Regulation has been repealed and replaced by Home Building Regulation 2014 (the 2014 Regulation).
4. The respondent submits, and I accept, that despite the repeal of the 2004 Regulation, the instrument of 20 December 2013 applies to Mr O'Connell's application. This is because cl 75(2) of the 2014 Regulation provides that any act, matter or thing that had effect under the 2004 Regulation continues to have effect under the 2014 Regulation.
5. Section 20(5) of the Home Building Act (both before and after the 2014 amendments) states that a decision relating to the determining of qualifications or other requirements in s 20(2) cannot be reviewed by the tribunal in an application for review made under the Act. That is, in the present circumstances, it is not open to the tribunal to review the fairness or otherwise of the qualification requirements set out in the instrument.
Does the applicant possess the required qualifications?
1. The required qualifications as contained in the instrument provide six different pathways (A-F) of meeting the qualification requirement for the electrical contractor licence.
2. Mr O'Connell has a Craft Certificate stating that he has satisfied the requirements for trade recognition and is adequately trained to pursue the trade of electrical (electrician). He also has significant experience in working as an electrician in commercial and industrial settings. He has never held a contractor licence in the category of electrical wiring work.
3. Mr O'Connell does not possess any of the Certificate III or TAFE qualifications referred to in pathways A, D, E or F. Because he has not held a contractor licence in respect of electrical wiring work or a supervisor certificate in respect of electrical wiring work, he does not meet the requirements in pathways B or C.
4. The only course which appears to be open to Mr O'Connell is for him to undertake a Certificate III course in Electrotechnology Electrician. He states that he is unable to do so as the course is only available to those working full time in the electrical trade and he is the carer for his very elderly grandmother and cannot work full time. Furthermore, he states that he cannot afford the fees. While I have considerable sympathy for Mr O'Connell's situation, he does not meet the requirements set out in the instrument and the decision under review must be affirmed.
Order
1. The decision under review is affirmed.
I hereby certify that this is a true and accurate record of the reasons for decision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.
Registrar
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 07 March 2017