NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arkup 2 Pty Ltd v Leech & Anor [2017] NSWSC 182 Hearing dates: 29, 30, 31 March 2016; 1 April 2016 Decision date: 09 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: White J Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $188,052 plus interest at the rates prescribed for the purposes of s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) from 9 August 2011 to the date of judgment. 2. Order that the plaintiff's claims be otherwise dismissed. 3. Order that the cross-claim be dismissed. Catchwords: EQUITY - trusts and trustees - whether defendant held property on constructive or resulting trust for plaintiff company – no agreement or common intention that property would be held on trust and no resulting trust - whether defendant owed plaintiff company moneys – debt not proven – whether cross-defendant made representations that property and profits from ventures would be shared equally with cross-claimant – representations not established – cross-defendant not required to account to cross-claimant – whether director of plaintiff-company and defendant were partners or parties to a joint venture – parties were not partners – parties did not enter into a joint venture - whether unconscionable for cross-defendant to deny that cross-claimant held a beneficial interest in assets – whether cross-defendant held property on constructive trust for cross-claimant – no constructive trust arose over property or profits. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137; [1987] HCA 59 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242; [1984] HCA 81 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 692; (1987) 5 ACLC 222 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583; [1985] HCA 78 Palermo v Palermo [2015] WASCA 49 Shepherd v Doolan [2005] NSWSC 42 United Dominions Corporation Limited v Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1; [1985] HCA 49 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161; (2003) 13 BPR 24,431 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Arkup No. 2 Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Alfred Mark Graham Leech (1st Defendant) Deborah Anne Leech (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Leech, director of plaintiff (Plaintiff) M Gunning (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate