NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brooks [2017] NSWSC 188 Hearing dates: 27 February 2017, 1-3 March 2017 Date of orders: 07 March 2017 Decision date: 07 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Evidentiary rulings made (see paragraph [83]) Provisional view indicated (see paragraph [84]) Advance ruling made (see paragraph [85]) Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – post-offence conduct – consciousness of guilt – disposal of weapon – washing of shoes – lies – whether evidence "intractably neutral" – where conduct may be explained by accused attempt to distance himself from incident – where accused produced knife during physical altercation – where accused makes formal admissions – whether admissions preclude prosecution from adducing evidence of those facts – conflict in authorities – telephone intercepts – whether discussion of offer to plead guilty demonstrates a consciousness of guilt – assessment of probative value and prejudicial effect CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – advance ruling – where accused seeks to introduce evidence of earlier assault – where evidence relevant to issue of self-defence – whether Crown entitled to lead evidence that accused threatened to stab the perpetrator – where threat unrelated to incident giving rise to charges Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baden-Clay v The Queen [2016] HCA 35; 334 ALR 234 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193; [1993] HCA 63 Frazer [2002] NSWCCA 59; 128 A Crim R 89 Gall v R [2015] NSWCCA 69 Mulvihill v R [2016] NSWCCA 529 R v Ciantar (2006) 16 VR 26; [2006] VSCA 263 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v JGW [1999] NSWCCA 116 R v Longford (1970) 17 FLR 37 R v Lucas [1981] 1 QB 720 R v Sievers [2004] NSWCCA 463; (2004) 151 A Crim R 426 R v Smith [1981] 1 NSWLR 193 R v Taranto, R v Freeman [1999] NSWCCA 396 R v White [1998] 2 SCR 72 Sievers [2004] NSW CCA 463; (2004) 151 A Crim R 426 Steer v R [2008] NSWCCA 295; (2008) 191 A Crim R 435 Stubley v Western Australia (2011) 242 CLR 374; [2011] HCA 7 Thalari v R (2009) 75 NSWLR 307; [2009] NSWCCA 170 The Queen v Bridgman (1980) 24 SASR 278 Yager v The Queen (1977) 139 CLR 28; [1977] HCA 10 Texts Cited: Peter Hidden, QC, "Plead Guilty and Get it Over With?" (1991) NSW Bar Association, Bar News Summer Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Bradley Brooks Representation: Counsel: Huw Baker (Crown) Andrew Boe (B Brooks)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate