NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Feeney v NSW Police [2017] NSWSC 190 Hearing dates: 15 February 2017 Date of orders: 15 February 2017 Decision date: 15 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the plaintiff Luke Feeney to appeal from the order of the Local Court (Stoddart LCM) made in Wollongong on 6/9/2016. (2) Order that the appeal be upheld. (3) Set aside the order made in the Local Court on 6/9/2016. (4) Direct that Exhibit B, a DVD, be returned to the plaintiff, Mr Feeney. (5) Order that Schedule B to the subpoena issued by the Local Court on 2/5/2016 be returnable before the Local Court at Kiama at 10am on 16/2/2017. (6) Order that these orders be issued forthwith. Catchwords: APPEAL FROM LOCAL COURT – question of law – error of law – failure to give adequate reasons – leave to appeal granted – appeal upheld Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 Liquor Act 2007 Summary Offences Act 1988 Cases Cited: Not Applicable Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Luke Feeney (P) NSW Police (D) Representation: Counsel: In person (P) D Parrish (D) File Number(s): 2016/293253 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
EX TEMPORE Judgment 1. On 20 September 2016 the applicant, Mr Luke Feeney, filed a summons seeking leave to appeal from an order made in the Local Court on 6 September 2016. The order was an interlocutory one in which the Local Court (Stoddart LCM) set aside part of a subpoena that had been issued in the Local Court on the basis that the applicant in this Court had not demonstrated a legitimate forensic purpose for the documents which were sought.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate