NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Parkview Constructions Pty Limited v Total Lifestyle Windows Pty Ltd t/a Total Concept Group [2017] NSWSC 194 Hearing dates: 22 February 2017 Decision date: 07 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Adjudication determination to be quashed. Injunctions to be made restraining relying on it. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (the Act) – ss 17(3), 17(5) and 19 – Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) ss21(1) – where an adjudication application made by the claimant differs from that referred by the authorised nominating authority to the adjudicator – where an adjudication application served on the respondent is not a copy of that referred to the adjudicator – where a claimant delivers a Universal Serial Bus (USB stick) containing an adjudication application – HELD: the adjudicator did not have jurisdiction to determine the adjudication application referred to him – HELD: delivery of USB stick is not service of a copy in writing until it is opened by the recipient – HELD: adjudication determination to be quashed. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570 Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 225 CLR 88 Capper v Thorpe (1998) 194 CLR 342 Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 393 Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd v Basetec Services Pty Ltd [2015] 1Qd R 265 Shorten v David Hurst Constructions Pty. Ltd. [2008] NSWSC 546 Timwin Constructions Pty Ltd v Façade Innovations Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 548 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Parkview Constructions Pty Limited - Plaintiff Total Lifestyle Windows Pty Ltd t/a total Concept Group - First Defendant Kenneth Spain - Second Defendant Representation: Counsel: M. Christie SC with A.R.R. Vincent - Plaintiff D.A. Savage QC with M.R. Bland - First Defendant Submitting appearance - Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate