NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sanderson as Liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Sakr [2017] NSWCA 38 Hearing dates: 23 November 2016 Date of orders: 09 March 2017 Decision date: 09 March 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [69]; Gleeson JA at [70]; Barrett AJA at [71]; Beach AJA at [72] Decision: 1 Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
2 Direct the applicant within 14 days to file a Notice of Appeal in the form of the Draft Notice of Appeal appearing at tab 3 of volume 1 of the White Book.
3 Appeal allowed.
4 Remit the application for remuneration to a judge of the Equity Division of the Court for rehearing. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – liquidators remuneration – whether error in failing to take into account the reasonableness of the work performed, the hourly rate and the time taken – whether error in applying considerations of proportionality – whether error in applying rates of ad valorem remuneration – whether failure to take into account that creditors had approved remuneration on the basis of time costing Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 473, 504, 488, 425, 449E Corporations Amendment (Insolvency) Act 2007 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A Cases Cited: Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424; [2001] FCA 1833 Conlan (as liquidator of Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd) v Adams (2008) 65 ACSR 521; [2008] WASCA 61 DAO v The Queen (2011) 81 NSWLR 568; [2011] NSWCCA 63 Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 124; [2008] HCA 13 Hall v Poolman (2009) 75 NSWLR 99; [2009] NSWCCA 64 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1292 Mirror Group Newspapers plc v Maxwell (No 2) [1998] 1 BCLC 638 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513; [1986] HCA 17 Re AAA Financial Intelligence Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) ACN 093 616 445 [2014] NSWSC 1270 Re Carton Ltd (1923) 39 TLR 194 Re Clout in its capacity as liquidator of Mainz Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] NSWSC 1146; (2016) 115 ACSR 459 Re Gramarkerr Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1405 Re Hellion Protection Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 1299 Re Korda; in the matter of Stockford Ltd (2004) 140 FCR 424; [2004] FCA 1682 Templeton v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2015) FCAFC 137; (2015) 108 ACSR 545 Venetian Nominees Pty Ltd v Conlan (1998) 20 WAR 96; (1998) 16 ACLC 1653 Warner, Re GTL Tradeup Pty Ltd (in liq) (2015) 104 ACSR 633; [2015] FCA 323 Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd (2012) 88 ACSR 80; [2012] NSWCA 79 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Clifford Sanderson as Liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Limited (in Liquidation) (ACN 090 735 587) (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: V Whittaker/L Hulmes (Applicant) DL Cook SC/M Cowden (ASIC) N Hutley SC/S Aspinall (ARITA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate