NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Roger Cheney pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 210 Hearing dates: Written Submissions Date of orders: 08 March 2017 Decision date: 08 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Latham J Decision: Application under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for inquiry into conviction and sentence following conviction – Pt 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Appeal and Review Act 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application by Roger Cheney pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 293
Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 260
Application of Peter James Holland under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251
R v Cheney (Criminal Court of Appeal (NSW), 28 April 1998, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roger Cheney (Applicant) Attorney General for the State of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self–represented (Applicant) Crown Solicitor for NSW (Respondent)
Solicitors: Self–represented (Applicant) Crown Solicitor for NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00281870 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate