NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miskelly v Transport for NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 75 Hearing dates: 29 November 2016 Decision date: 09 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member Decision: 1. The decision of the respondent is set aside.
2. The respondent is to release the documents as described in accordance with the orders at the conclusion of this decision. Catchwords: Government Information (Public Access) – public interest considerations in favour of disclosure – public interest considerations against disclosure – weight of evidence – presumption in favour of disclosure not displaced. Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Transport Administrative Act 1988 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Cameron v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2014] NSWCATAD 13 Fire Brigade Union v Fire and Rescue (NSW) [2014] NSWCATAD 13. Flack v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury [2006] HCA 45 Sobh v Police Force (Vic) [1994] 1 VR 41. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Greg Miskelly (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: P McKinnon (Applicant) K Sanders (Respondent) File Number(s): 1610278
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate