NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Peter Luscombe Ward v Youfa Xiang [2017] NSWCA 39 Hearing dates: 17/02/2017 Date of orders: 09 March 2017 Decision date: 09 March 2017 Before: Gleeson JA; Leeming JA; McDougall J Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct – appeal from decision of primary judge finding representations were made and relied upon – where appellant misrepresented operations of the business to potential investor – whether appellant engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct – where representations were made through a third party – whether the representations were relied upon by the plaintiff Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Luscombe Ward (Appellant) Youfa Xiang (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Windsor SC (Appellant) M W Young SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Capello Rowe Lawyers (Appellant) Dixon Holmes Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/151241 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: [2016] NSWDC 86 Date of Decision: 04/05/2016 Before: P Taylor SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/304886
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate