NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Manny v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2017] NSWCA 44 Hearing dates: 9 March 2017 Decision date: 09 March 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1], [24] and [26]; Basten JA at [2]; Ward JA at [25] Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL AND REVIEW – judicial review – review of order in criminal jurisdiction of District Court under s 69 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) – supervisory jurisdiction limited to review of jurisdictional error by s 176 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) – whether decision of District Court rejecting application for annulment of convictions in Local Court infected by procedural unfairness
CRIME – conviction in absence of defendant – application to annul – whether defendant hindered by illness from attending – delay – whether annulment in interests of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 4, 8, 11A, 18, 52 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jeff Manny (Applicant) Australian Securities and Investment Commission (First Respondent) District Court of NSW (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self-represented Ms K Lawrence (Solicitor) (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate