NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholson v The Queen [2017] NSWCCA 38 Hearing dates: 14 March 2017 Date of orders: 14 March 2017 Decision date: 14 March 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Garling J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [48] Decision: (1) Application for Leave to Appeal filed 7 December 2016 be dismissed; (2) Application for Leave to appeal filed 1 February 2017 be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against interlocutory judgment or order – whether a Basha inquiry is an interlocutory judgment or order – no interlocutory judgment or order made by trial judge – application for leave to appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v Dylan Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65 Kocer v R [2006] NSWCCA 328 KS v Veitch [2012] NSWCCA 186 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Bozatsis & Spanakakis (1997) 97 A Crim R 296 R v F [2002] NSWCCA 125 R v Steffan (1993) 30 NSWLR 633 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Frederick Nicholson (Applicant) The Queen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Edwards (Applicant) N Adams (Respondent) G Bashir SC (Protected Confider)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate