NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chel v Fairfax Media Publications (No 6) [2017] NSWSC 230 Hearing dates: 6 February 2017 to 27 February 2017 Decision date: 14 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Jury directed to answer question in the form of Annexure A Catchwords: DEFAMATION – contextual truth – reasons for rulings made during trial – jury asked questions in two phases – rulings concern contextual truth defence – whether contextual imputation must be defamatory – whether imputation pleaded by plaintiff found to be defamatory and substantially true can be deployed by plaintiff, deployed by defendant or disregarded in applying s 26 of the Defamation Act – whether effect of all defamatory imputations on reputation considered along with facts surrounding all contextual imputations – whether jury should consider evidence of plaintiff's reputation in applying s 26(b) Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 1974 Defamation Act 2005, ss 3, 8, 26 Cases Cited: Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] HCA 15; (1993) 177 CLR 485 Besser v Kermode (aka Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Kermode) [2011] NSWCA 174; 81 NSWLR 157 Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 1651 Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 369; (2014) 88 NSWLR 421 James Phillip v Robab Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1520 John Fairfax Publications v Blake [2001] NSWCA 434 Oscar Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 44 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 196 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 224 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Limited (No 3) [2011] QSC 375 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Limited [2013] QCA 68 O'Brien v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2016] NSWSC 1289 Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090 The Federal Capital Press of Australia Ltd v Balzola [2015] NSWCA 285 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Lili Chel (Plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Vanda Carson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Evatt; R Rasmussen; I Kirgiz; J Hennes (Plaintiff) T Blackburn SC; L Barnett (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate