NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: (re Dargan) Amaca Pty Limited v Northern Sydney Area Health Service & Ors [2017] NSWDDT 1 Hearing dates: 28 February 2017 Decision date: 16 March 2017 Before: Kearns J Decision: There will be a verdict and judgment for Amaca against Northern Health in the sum of $68,625 and against Hunter Health in the sum of $33,750. Catchwords: Dust Diseases – cross claim – mesothelioma – statutory compensation paid to plaintiff by WorkCover Queensland – agreement between WorkCover Queensland and plaintiff that in proceedings against Amaca Pty Limited, plaintiff may retain 20% of proceeds if proceeds less than compensation received – proceedings by plaintiff against Amaca Pty Limited – plaintiff's proceedings settled for less than compensation received – whether the agreement resulted in plaintiff receiving double compensation – if so, whether Amaca Pty Limited and cross defendants were not "liable in respect of (the) damage" suffered by the plaintiff within the meaning of s 5 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) such that Amaca Pty Limited could not claim contribution from the cross defendants Legislation Cited: Workers' Compensation Act 2003 (Qld); Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW); Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) Cases Cited: Redding v Lee (1982-3) 151 CLR 117; Manser v Spry (1994) 181 CLR 428; Harris v Commercial Minerals Ltd (1995-6) 181 CLR 1; The National Insurance Company of New Zealand Ltd v Espagne (1961) 105 CLR 569 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amaca Pty Limited (Cross-Claimant); Northern Sydney Area Health Service (First Cross-Defendant); Hunter and New England Area Health Service (Second Defendant); State of Queensland (Third Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Sheller appeared for the Cross-Claimant; Mr D Miller SC with Mr M Smith appeared for the first and second Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate