NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Kay [2017] NSWSC 254 Hearing dates: 27 February 2017 Date of orders: 17 March 2017 Decision date: 17 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Order pursuant to s 5C of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 that Graham James Kay be subject to a high risk sex offender extended supervision order for a period of 3 years from today.
(2) Direct pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 for the period of the high risk sex offender extended supervision order that Graham James Kay comply with the conditions set out in the SCHEDULE to these orders. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – serious sex offender – whether defendant a high risk sex offender – whether high risk sex offender extended supervision order should be made Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offender Registration) Act 2004 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Anderson [2015] NSWSC 1515 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Kay [2016] NSWSC 1820 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Graham James Kay (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Plaintiff) A Cook (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/356365 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate