NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Pratten [2016] NSWCCA 322 Hearing dates: 17 November 2016 Decision date: 17 November 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Campbell J at [21]; N Adams J at [22] Decision: Refuse application for adjournment. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – application by offender for adjournment of prosecution appeals against inadequacy of sentences – pending application for removal of proceedings to High Court – whether High Court application raised an arguable issue – whether current proceedings should be adjourned until removal application considered by High Court Legislation Cited: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 40, 78B Cases Cited: Pham v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCAFC 179 R v Pratten (No 26) [2016] NSWSC 935 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Appellant) Timothy Charles Pratten (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M McHugh SC/Ms A Hawkins (Appellant) Mr M W Smith (Respondent)
Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/315475; 2012/207027 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court; District Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Division; Criminal Citation: [2016] NSWSC 539 Date of Decision: 29 April 2016; 22 July 2016 Before: Rothman J; Baly DCJ File Number(s): 2010/315475; 2012/207027
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate