NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kaveh v R [2017] NSWCCA 52 Hearing dates: 13 March 2017 Decision date: 24 March 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Latham J at [9]; Campbell J at [44] Decision: 1. Refuse leave to appeal on Ground One. 2. Refuse leave to appeal on Ground Two. 3. Dismiss the application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – sentencing – whether error of principle permitting appeal from the exercise of a discretionary power – failure to accord weight to mental health issues – mental health addressed for relevant purposes – no relevant error identified
CRIME – appeal – sentencing – hardship to members of offender's family – whether – exceptional hardship required for purposes of s 16A(2)(p), Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – whether sentencing court misapplied principle – hardship not excluded from consideration Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A(2)(p) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 307.2(1) Cases Cited: Benetiz v R [2006] NSWCCA 21 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Pratten (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 42 Elshani v R [2015] NSWCCA 254 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jones v R [2009] NSWCCA 169 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118; (2011) 209 A Crim R 509 Lam v R [2015] NSWCCA 143 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 R v Nguyen [2006] NSWCCA 369 R v X [2004] NSWCCA 93 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222; (2013) 235 A Crim R 265 Wright v R [2016] NSWCCA 122 WW v R [2012] NSWCCA 165 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohammad Reza Kaveh (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Parsons (Applicant) G Wright (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate