NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Timm v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1149 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 March 2017 Date of orders: 24 March 2017 Decision date: 24 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL under s97(1)(b) against refusal of application for subdivision of existing residential lot into two lots: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Timm (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr. G, McKee, McKee Legal Solutions (Applicant) Mr. S, Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00341442 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against the refusal of Development Application No. 2016/0712 for the Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two lots, and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling at 5 Iraga Place, Forrestville. 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement are: 1. The appeal is upheld; and 2. Development Application No. Da2016/0712 at 5 Iraga Place, Forrestville for the Torrens title subdivision (one lot into two lots) and park demolition and additions to the existing dwelling house on Lot 1. is approved subject to conditions of consent set out in Annexure A. ……………. D M Dickson Commissioner of the Court 341442.16 Dickson (C) (243 KB, pdf) 341442.16 Plans (5.22 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 24 March 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate