NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eather v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCATOD 42 Hearing dates: 31 October 2016 Date of orders: 28 March 2017 Decision date: 28 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Millbank, Senior Member Decision: 1. The Application is dismissed pursuant to s 55(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW); 2. A non publication order under s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) prohibiting disclosure or publication of the name of the patient in the HCCC evidence; 3. Pursuant to cl 13(3A) of Sch 5D of the National Law the Applicant is to pay the HCCC costs in the amount of $4772. Catchwords: Costs ‒ application for reinstatement by de-registered practitioner ‒ application withdrawn when matter part heard. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) ss 55; 64 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 (NSW) ('The National Law') ss 145C; 145I; Sch 5D cl 13(3A) Cases Cited: Donnelly v HCCC [2014] NSWCATOD 155; HCCC v Eather (No 1) [2011] NSWCHT 1; HCCC v Eather (No 2) [2011] NSWCHT 2; HCCC v Eather (No 3) [2013] NSWCHT 2 HCCC v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342; Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Category: Costs Parties: Paul Matthew Eather, (Applicant)
Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Kauffman (Applicant - in part), The Applicant appeared for himself in part Mr Britt (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate