NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sharma v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATOD 46 Hearing dates: 16 March 2017 Date of orders: 29 March 2017 Decision date: 29 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Emeritus Prof G Walker, Senior Member Decision: Decision under review set aside. Catchwords: SECURITY INDUSTRY – revocation of security guard licence – fit and proper person – public interest – common purpose – self-defence. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997; Civil and Administrative Review Act 2013; Crimes Act 1900; Security Industry Act 1997; Security Industry Regulation 2016. Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 94 ALR 11; Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor [1995] 131 ALR 657; Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9; Esterman v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70; Feuerstein v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2007] NSWADT 114; Haining v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [1999] NSWADT 6; Hughes and Vale Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Ibrahim v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2009] NSWADT 245; IJ v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 230; Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents' Board (1979) 22 SASR 70. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Prabhat Sharma (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: C Vassiliou (Applicant) Smythe Wozniak (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378817
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate