NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gassman & Anor v Peck [2017] NSWCATAP 66 Hearing dates: 29 August 2016 and written submissions by 25 January 2017. Date of orders: 29 March 2017 Decision date: 29 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hon G Mullane ADCJ, Principal Member J Wakefield, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed;
(2) The order of the Tribunal of 20 May 2016 that "Each party is to bear its own costs" is set aside;
(3) The respondent to the appeal, Nathan Peck, must pay the costs of the appellants Peter Gassman and Beth Roddy in proceedings HB 14/17549 in the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal as agreed (or as assessed) less $500.00; and
(4) The respondent to the appeal Nathan Peck must pay the Appellants' costs of the appeal as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: Costs- building case- settled without hearing- appeal against refusal to order costs. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2012; Home Building Act 1989 Interpretation Act 1987; Cases Cited: Prendergast v Weston Murray Irrigation Limited [2014] NSW CATAP 69; Bonita v Shen [2016] NSWCATAP 159 (25 July 2016); Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth): Ex Parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd (1993) FCR 194; R v Gold Coast City council; Ex parte Raysun Pty Ltd [1971] QWN 13; South East Queensland Electricity Board v Australian Telecommunications Commission Fed C of A, 10 February 1989(unreported); Mabel Dorothea Fligg v The Owners Strata Plan 53457 [2012] NSWSC 230; Transfield Services (Australia) (Pty Ltd) v James Gaha [2012] NSWSC 865; Farah v Elias [2015] NSWSC 1417 (at [17]; Hertslet v Doherty; Doherty v Hertselt [2016] NSWCATAP 46; Glover v Buckton Building Pty Limited [2015] NSWCATCD 146; Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Gassman & Beth Roddy (Appellant's) Nathan Peck (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Moutalli (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate