NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ralston v Jurisich [2017] NSWCA 63 Hearing dates: 06/03/2017 Date of orders: 03 April 2017 Decision date: 03 April 2017 Before: Ward JA; Emmett AJA; McDougall J Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE – where client suing former solicitors – where client incurred significant income tax liability after realising shares in a company – failure to advise – whether the respondent had proved factual causation – how factual causation is to be proved – whether primary judge erred in his implicit findings as to the loss caused by the breach – APPEALS – principles of appellate review – function of appellate court in relation to fact finding at trial Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 50 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Cases Cited: Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (2012) 248 CLR 500 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Hunt and Hunt Lawyers (a firm) v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd (2013) 247 CLR 613 Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932 Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2012) 246 CLR 182 Takla v Nasr [2013] NSWCA 435 Wallace v Kam (2012) 250 CLR 375 Warren v Coombes (1979) 182 CLR 531 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Malbon Ralston (First Appellant) and 8 others Helen Jurisich (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J C Giles SC (Appellants) S R Donaldson SC / M Sealey (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate